After the Chat GPT violations.. Can artificial intelligence be prosecuted?

 After chatbots "Chat GBT" have long been known to people with "false" information, specialists are preparing to search for possible legal ways to deter these programs, prosecute those responsible for them, and compensate the affected people.

Communications and information technology expert, Salloum Al-Dahdah, gave examples of crimes that some chat platforms based on artificial intelligence have been involved in so far, including violating property and publishing rights, providing false information and false news, and defaming people.

Al-Dahdah added, in an interview with "Sky News Arabia": "The most prominent accusation that was reported in the media is that of the chatbot, Chat GBT, about defaming the mayor of Hepburnshire in Australia, Brian Hood." The Australian mayor discovered that the "chatbot" had been falsely branded as "involved in a foreign bribery scandal" involving a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Australia in the 2000s.

The chatbot alleged that the Australian mayor had served prison time as a result of the crime. The Australian mayor may be the owner of the world's first defamation lawsuit against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGBT, after the app falsely accused him of the crime.

Can AI officials be sued?

Technology and information security expert, Shagali Jaafar, shed light on the technical aspect regarding the possibility of prosecuting artificial intelligence officials, saying: “Artificial intelligence algorithms and their applications are owned by companies known to the judiciary and law enforcement agencies, and they have technical means that they can provide to judicial authorities and victims to prove incident and finding out the perpetrators.

Jaafar explained that "the application of artificial intelligence can be sued through its developers and the companies that own it." He continued, "These entities can also give the judicial authorities a 'technical guide' that can provide justice to victims of artificial intelligence crimes, and it is necessary to train 'judicial bodies' on this mechanism."